Skip to content
Request a demonstration

Trust · Pilot security requirements

What would have to be true before we trust it with real data?

A private pilot has a gate with twenty items. Today none is verified on a deployed environment, and the gate is closed. That is a finding, not an aim, and it is shown as one.

No certification, audit or independent assessment is held. Each statement below shows how sure the project is of it.

What exists, and how sure we are

  • Not in placeThe real-customer-data gate is closed, with no item verified on a deployed environment.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.
  • Not in placeNo certification, audit or independent assessment is held.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.
  • Not establishedNo independent penetration test has been commissioned or performed.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.
  • Not in placePilot terms and data-processing terms have not been reviewed by qualified counsel.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.
  • Partly in placeSeparation between organisations is covered by many local and pipeline tests, but no independent party has tested it.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.
  • Partly in placeAn incident procedure is written, but no alert is deployed to reach a named person.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.
  • Not in placeNo map follows a customer's content from upload to export, so a statement about where it goes cannot yet be checked.Recorded in the pilot evidence pack.

See it in an example

Simulation. A scripted example on fictional data. The wording is scripted and no model is called; the figures are computed from what you decide, and a person’s approval covers exactly what you decided.

See when the real-data gate could open

What happened
Meridian Textiles (fictional) will share real data only when the gate is open, and wants to understand what would have to change.
The question
How many critical items must be verified, on evidence how old, before the gate could open? Asked by: Pilot sponsor at a customer (fictional).
  1. See when the real-data gate could openMove the evidence. The gate counts only items verified on a deployed environment, with evidence no older than ninety days.Open

    Move the evidence. The gate counts only items verified on a deployed environment, with evidence no older than ninety days.

    Change the assumptions. Every result and the answer below are recomputed from them, and a warning appears when a result crosses a stated limit.

    Assumptions you can change
    0Today the pack records none.
    0
    30 days
    Evidence still counts (1 if within ninety days, 0 if older)
    1
    Critical items still open
    11
    Items still open, of twenty
    20

    The gate stays closed while any critical item is open.

    With 0 of 11 critical items verified, on evidence 30 days old, 11 critical item(s) are still open and 20 of 20 items are open in all.

    As recorded in the pilot evidence pack today, no item is verified on a deployed environment, so the gate is closed [S1].

    Evidence older than ninety days, or for a different build, does not count, so an item that was verified can fall back out [S2].

    Relies on: S1 · The pilot evidence pack: its twenty items, eleven of them criticalS2 · The gate's rules: which environments count and how old evidence may be

    The customer's pilot sponsor decides. Approving records the conditions the customer would require before sharing real data. It does not open the gate, and it is not an assessment of the platform.

    Ready.

Not done here. It does not open the gate or assess the platform: the gate opens only on evidence from a deployed environment, and none is held yet.

What a reviewer can have, and what not yet

  • We can hand overThe pilot evidence pack: each of the twenty items, what exists for it and what is needed to verify it.
  • We cannot yetAny item verified on a deployed environment, an independent penetration test, and counsel-reviewed pilot terms.

The capabilities behind this

The other nine