Enterprise intelligence
Every process.Every risk.Every decision.Connected, governed, evidenced.
One environment for how work is done, who is trained, what the rules require and what was decided. Select any part to see how it works.
Public access is not open yet. Private demonstrations and controlled pilots are available by arrangement.
SOP Intelligence
From a recording to a verified practitioner.
SOP Intelligence is designed to carry one procedure from how the work is really done to proof that someone can do it, with a person deciding at every point that matters.
The SOP journey, in eight steps
Fictional example Harlow Precision Components, a fictional manufacturer, and a press die changeover.
01Capture People and Averyniq
Take in how work is really done: a video of the task, a voice walkthrough, a screen recording, existing documents, or a practical demonstration by the person who knows.
- Information in
- A six-minute video of a senior operator changing the die on Press 4.
- Averyniq proposes
- Reads what is said and shown, and separates the recording into candidate moments.
- A person decides
- The operator confirms that this is the way the task is really done.
- Recorded
- The source video, with who recorded it and when, stored for this organisation only.
02Interpret Averyniq
Read what was captured, and where the recording and the documents agree or disagree.
- Information in
- The transcript, the video frames and the existing changeover checklist.
- Averyniq proposes
- Finds nine steps, two warnings, and one place where the recording and the checklist disagree.
- A person decides
- A quality engineer looks at the disagreement and says which is right.
- Recorded
- Each finding, pointing to the moment or passage it came from.
03Draft Averyniq
Draft a structured procedure: ordered steps, tools, materials, warnings and quality checks, each pointing back to its source.
- Information in
- The interpreted findings the quality engineer accepted.
- Averyniq proposes
- Drafts an ordered procedure and marks every step with its source.
- A person decides
- No one decides yet. The draft is marked as a draft and cannot be published.
- Recorded
- Draft 0.1, with its sources.
04Review People
Put the draft in front of the people who own the work, beside its source, so they can correct a step, confirm a safety-critical one, or send it back.
- Information in
- Draft 0.1 beside the video moments it came from.
- Averyniq proposes
- Flags step 6, a torque setting, as safety-critical and not yet confirmed.
- A person decides
- The procedure owner rewords step 4 and confirms step 6 by name.
- Recorded
- Every edit and confirmation, with the person and the time.
05Approve People
Record who approved which version and when. Nothing is published on a draft's say-so.
- Information in
- The reviewed draft and its list of open items.
- Averyniq proposes
- Checks that no safety-critical step is still unconfirmed.
- A person decides
- The plant manager approves version 1.0, by name.
- Recorded
- The approval of version 1.0, with the earlier drafts kept.
06Train People and Averyniq
Turn the approved procedure into training for the right people, in their language, and track who has been assigned what.
- Information in
- Approved version 1.0, the team roster and each person's preferred language.
- Averyniq proposes
- Prepares a short lesson and questions taken only from the approved text, in English and Hindi.
- A person decides
- The training lead checks that the lesson matches the procedure, then releases it.
- Recorded
- Who was assigned which version, and when.
07Verify People
Let a learner show they can do the work, with a named supervisor deciding what they saw.
- Information in
- A learner doing the changeover while a supervisor watches.
- Averyniq proposes
- Gives the supervisor the checklist, step by step, to mark as the work is done.
- A person decides
- The supervisor decides for each step: competent, or needs coaching.
- Recorded
- The supervisor's decision on each step, by name. This is the learner's evidence.
08Improve People and Averyniq
Feed gaps, version differences and reviewer findings back to the procedure's owner, so the next version is better and the old one stays on record.
- Information in
- Gaps seen in verification, and a change to a supplier's part.
- Averyniq proposes
- Suggests which steps to revise and which learners to check again.
- A person decides
- The owner decides whether to start version 1.1.
- Recorded
- Version 1.1 begins. Version 1.0 stays on record.
Step 3 of 8
Draft
Draft a structured procedure: ordered steps, tools, materials, warnings and quality checks, each pointing back to its source.
- Information in
- The interpreted findings the quality engineer accepted.
- Averyniq proposes
- Drafts an ordered procedure and marks every step with its source.
- A person decides
- No one decides yet. The draft is marked as a draft and cannot be published.
- Recorded
- Draft 0.1, with its sources.
See SOP Intelligence in full →Try the interactive demonstration →
Where to start
Tell us who you are and we will show you what matters.
Choose a role or an industry. Each shows the parts of the platform that bear on that work.
By role
Chief executive or board
One governed view of health, risk and decisions, where every figure shows its source.
What to look at first
Operations and quality
Procedures that match how the work is done, and proof that people can do them.
What to look at first
Compliance and risk
What applies, who owns it, and the evidence that it is met.
What to look at first
Finance leaders
Findings with evidence, impact shown as an estimate, and savings counted only when measured.
What to look at first
Legal counsel
Contracts read against your playbook, with counsel deciding.
What to look at first
Technology and security
What data is read, where it goes and how to take it back.
What to look at first
Training and people
Teaching the approved way, and seeing that it is done.
What to look at first
By industry
Healthcare
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Manufacturing
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Banking
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Insurance
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Retail
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Logistics
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Technology
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Education
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Professional services
Each industry is shown with a fictional organisation and the same five use cases, so you can compare.
What to look at first
Trust and data control
You should know exactly what happens to your information.
Before any data is shared, each pilot sets out in writing what you provide, what is processed, which providers may receive it, where, what is kept and for how long, and what you control.
- 01
You choose what goes in
Sources are connected only with your permission, and what was and was not read is listed.
- 02
AI use is disclosed
Every AI-assisted output names its source and is marked for a person to review.
- 03
People decide
Nothing is published, approved or sent on a model's say-so.
- 04
Evidence you can inspect
Who did what, when and from which source is recorded, and can be exported.
No certification is held or claimed.
Start where it suits you.
Explore at your own pace, ask for a private demonstration, or talk to us about becoming a pilot partner.